Luar's Flash Playground:Flex Builder 2與RemoteObject的空歡喜大騙局
Flex Builder 2與RemoteObject的空歡喜大騙局 (06-11-2005)

細心看看Flex Enterprise Services 2的介紹,會發現RemoteObject被納入為功能之一:

Flex provides three ways of sending and receiving data using remote procedure calls (RPC). These are the HTTPService, WebService, and RemoteObject tags. The first two can be used by any application built in Flex Builder 2. The RemoteObject tag requires an additional server, such as Flex Enterprise Services, to process the RemoteObject requests.原文
在其他文檔,多次強調,如果你想用Flash Remoting,此功能不在Flex Builder 2中,必須配合Flex Server。

Cold Fusion用家還好,可以用Flex 2 ColdFusion Adapter

最簡單而言之,如果你想用<USD1000 Flex Builder 2開發你的RIA,你只可以用HTTPService和WebService,你要用Flash Remoting連接外面那些AMFPHP, OpenAMF等,你暫時是沒有方法的!

The server component of Flex 2 isn't available in the alpha release of the Flex Framework that's included with Flex Builder — so there's no more Flash Remoting gateway for the RemoteObject, HTTPService, and WebService MXML tags. Currently, the RemoteObject tag is not functional. You can still use the HTTPService and WebService tags but only from trusted domains. This means that the resource must be on a server that is in the same domain as the Flex application or from a server that has a crossdomain.xml file, or you can throw together your own proxy. Look at this article on accessing data for more info.原文
將來待Flex Enterprise Services 2和Server Component之一的RemoteObject放出來後,大家才有機會測試一下。但是Macromedia已經留下伏筆,想用Remoting,這是Server功能之一,Remoting Gateway等設定,都要在flex-services.xml設定;如果Macromedia不放出Client side Flash Remoting Component(就像給Flash IDE使用那些),看來大家別妄想用Flex Builder 2,享受它的Flex Framework 2帶來MXML, Components和Data Binding上方便,配合其他免費Remoting Services開發無需Server,在任何Server部署SWF之RIA。

都話Macromedia冇咁好死o架啦 凸-_-凸

本文章由發表。
意見
"; print "沒有意見。
 "; } ?>
  • Macromedia一步一步来部署嘛,等大家慢慢适应Macromedia的RIA整合。Macromedia 呢次的AS3.0就可以睇到啦。

    由386於06-11-2005發表

  • Well, I did remember that Mike Chamber mention that flash remoting will make into the Beta version of the Flex2. Le't hope macromedi/Adobe won't be that stupid!

    由Jono於06-11-2005發表

  • 就象flash lite player要收费一样,MM纯粹是自做聪明。包括breeze player,非要自己保留一个屏幕分享的功能,很丑恶的行为。应该学习GOOGLE的广阔胸襟。也许真的到了微软出招的时候了,没有竞争,就会出现“恶人”

    由s22於06-11-2005發表

同組文章